The use of technology in sports- A bane or boon
In the current scenario technology in sports plays an important role. It should be used for the benefit of game and can bring more excitement. By placing the technology in any sports it puts less pressure on the umpires and can reduce the mistakes in the game. The debatle Decision Review System is an example of that. The Indian team always opposes because the board says that it should be fool proof. In the current ashes series so many decision went wrong because of the technology, hot spot, the snicko. The wrong use of technology can change the situation of the match. I think the technology must be used in a proper manner so that it does create problems for the umpries and the audiences must enjoy the game.In the new rule the teams can review 2 after 80 overs before how many times they have used the systems.
In Badminton the use of technology must be there. The lines man role and the umpires role should be reduced so that players can play the game within spirit. The players should be allowed 1 opportunity to review it. The BWF must make arrangements for this technology.
The use of technology in sports esepcially indoor games like Basketball, Volleyball must be more because one mistake of the umpires can change the game. The negative point of the technology is that the governments must use in the state structure.
Hockey, Football are games in which technology is most important. In these games the use of technology and the talk with third umpire so that the close decision with help of on-field umpire change the decision if there is penalty corner.
The countries in cricket, football, hockey and other sports must make sure that the technology must be used in important events like World Cups, CWG, Asian games and other important games .
The boards approval in the use of technology is important and the it should be the role of the media to give information if there are technology introduced. Many experts says that in cricket that technology must be used when it for the benefit for the game and does not harm the game. I am on the firm view that in game like cricket especially where the people treat the game as a religion the technology must be used in ODI's atleast 1 review.
For example when there is an edge and then the hot spots does not show that mark it raises questions on the technology that is why the boards decide before applying to the series.
In Badminton the use of technology must be there. The lines man role and the umpires role should be reduced so that players can play the game within spirit. The players should be allowed 1 opportunity to review it. The BWF must make arrangements for this technology.
The use of technology in sports esepcially indoor games like Basketball, Volleyball must be more because one mistake of the umpires can change the game. The negative point of the technology is that the governments must use in the state structure.
Hockey, Football are games in which technology is most important. In these games the use of technology and the talk with third umpire so that the close decision with help of on-field umpire change the decision if there is penalty corner.
The countries in cricket, football, hockey and other sports must make sure that the technology must be used in important events like World Cups, CWG, Asian games and other important games .
The boards approval in the use of technology is important and the it should be the role of the media to give information if there are technology introduced. Many experts says that in cricket that technology must be used when it for the benefit for the game and does not harm the game. I am on the firm view that in game like cricket especially where the people treat the game as a religion the technology must be used in ODI's atleast 1 review.
For example when there is an edge and then the hot spots does not show that mark it raises questions on the technology that is why the boards decide before applying to the series.
Comments